Devil Information

Daredevil Visionaries Vol 1 Guardian Devil v 1

User Ratings and Reviews

4 Stars Greatly impressed
This was a very impressive piece for DD, I had been a fan for years, but with certain elements that were added, I found this to be a rendition that brought DD back into the original foundation. My ties with Daredevil go back to the Fall of the Mutants, in which he protected his home turf and suffered dearly for it – that was the Daredevil I knew, and during the years he had lost some of his way. In this piece he gained back a lot of his strength, especially his hard shell and emotional core of stability. He was always a softie, a tough guy with heart of gold, and in the last decade he had lost that humanizing touch and became something of a robot. A few preceeding writers tried to bring it back, a couple story lines worked in humanizing him for a short time, but overall, he had the right feel, never had the right mix of compassion, humanity, and vigilante protection – not simply vigilante justice, but vigilante protection. Daredevil has always been the type of hero that would prefer carrying people out of his neighborhood as a message then leaving them as a bloody stain on the sidewalk for others to gawk at. He is a protector, not simply a method of vendetta. So I have found it odd that for years he has been drawn as the tough guy who beats on everyone and leaves the innocent to fend for themselves, because that’s antithetical to his originations.

This is one of the storylines that brought DD back to his originations, it may have used a second rate (even a third rate) villian, but that was the point, why suspect someone who ranks so utterly incapable in the eyes of others? If you’re going to go out with flare and style, make the biggest production as possible, right? That was the theory behind Kevin Smith’s selection of villian and the entire story arc, and in my opinion, it was beautifully written, scripted, pencilled, coloured and drawn. There were a few flaws, but extremely minor in comparison to other storylines in previous years relating to various titles.

5 Stars almost made me a Daredevil fan
I admit that I’m not much of a fan of Daredevil. I don’t know why, but for some reason he never drew me in. But I saw Kevin Smith wrote it (and Queseda was the artist), and since I love his writing in his movies, I thought I’d check this out. It’s really good. Though I’m still not a ‘devil fan.

3 Stars Adequate story let down by the graphics
This story is OK only. Daredevil and all are mesmerised by Mysterio who, having been diagnosed with a terminal condition, decided to go out by staging a grand operatic finale taking it out on poor Daredevil, a proxy victim of his nemesis Spiderman.

I didn’t care for the introduction of Dr Strange as this is a story with religious overtures and the demon that Strange summoned is just over the top. Neither did I care for the appearance of Bullseye, who, if Marvel is not careful, will fall into the Batman/Joker routine. The treatment of Karen Page’s character is also disappointing. She comes across as a walk-on character, despite the lengthy thought balloons attributed to her. The intent of the story (and Bullseye introduction) appears to be to kill off her character.

Contrast the above exact same elements with “Born Again” which has a far superior storyline (and graphics).

The last section of this graphic novel is the most disappointing. The overly complex fight scene with Mysterio, and the overdrawn epilogue on Karen’s death, reflection etc.

The graphics are OK only. The slightly cartoony style jars with the dark mood of this story-line. The lettering of Karen Page’s thought balloons are too small.

5 Stars Great stuff……
First off, I was’nt in tears, as one reviewer has claimed, but I was in awe of the great writing and artwork!

I read “Daredevil: Guardian Devil Vol. 1″ for one reason, because Kevin Smith wrote it. I like his comedy and movies, figured his first attempt at writing the entire story for a graphic novel was worth reading!

This novel has a nice (intro) written by Ben Affleck and a nice (afterword) written by Kevin Smith!

The story is excellent, I’m not a huge comic fan, so I was’nt fully aware of Daredevil’s backstory, but I didn’t need it, the novel explains it easily!

Along with Kevin’s great story, this novel also features alot of classic characters such as:

Spiderman, The Thing, Bullseye, Black Widow, Mephisto, Dr. Strange, Kingpin and Mysterio

Good stuff, recommended!!

2 Stars I don’t think so…
I noticed that most of these reviews were written shortly after this arc came out. Now, almost ten years later, I think it deserves to be looked at again with fresh eyes. After having read what came after, with Bendis+Maleev and Brubaker+Lark, this just doesn’t measure up. And quite frankly, it doesn’t measure up to the last couple of years of Volume 1 either. I’m glad Kevin Smith came in and created a lot of hype since it meant getting Volume 2 off to a good start, but I think the hype is bigger than the quality.

Smith’s material comes off as needlessly preachy in the “Catholicism department,” and the plot is a little wacky. I also have problems with the pointless death of Karen Page (I guess that’s a bit of a spoiler, but I guess most people picking this up in 2007 would know about that). I also can’t stand Joe Quesada’s art, but that’s just a personal preference.

Daredevil is an amazingly versatile character that works as both fun and upbeat (like under Kesel and Kelly, respectively), and as dark and gritty (Miller, most of the people that followed Miller, Bendis, and Brubaker). I wouldn’t say that Smith doesn’t get the character – he obviously loves the character – but I think many other writers understand him better.

If you’re completely new to DD, you might as well skip this whole chapter. At the very least, it doesn’t add anything important to the mythos.

Buy/More Info

The Book of Joby

User Ratings and Reviews

2 Stars Bland boring book from a good idea
No originality here. What could have been a great concept, the Job bet in modern day, turns into a God Saves the Day in the end. Joby is whiny and quickly loses sympathy (by half way through you wish Lucifer would do more to destroy this kid just to shut him up.)

All in all, boring, unimaginative, and forgetable.

5 Stars Amazing first novel!
I don’t know how much more I can say that isn’t already contained in previous reviews, other than it was an amazing read. It’s hard to imagine that this was Ferrari’s first published foray into writing, as the characters were all eloquently drawn and had just enough depth to really pull you into the story.

I sincerely hope we see more stories like this from Mark, and if you haven’t picked it up yet, do it, you wont regret it.

5 Stars “This same stupid EXCELLANT bet!”
This book is absolutely amazing! It grabs you and pulls you in and doesn’t let you go. I read it for 10 hours in a row at one point, and finished it in two days. Now, I’m starting to reread it. Very excellant tale, at times you find yourself fretting over all the problems Joby goes through and you have to remind yourself it’s not real! I greatly recommend this to anyone who loves science fiction and fantasy, or is just looking for a good read!

5 Stars Unexpected Enjoyment
I purchased this book for myself and have now lent it out to all my family members for them to enjoy this unique spin on a ‘classic’. I was not sure what to expect, but was pleasantly surprised.

5 Stars Vastly Entertaining
I recently finished reading this book and loved every minute of it. If I were to compare it to something it is along the fun and interesting lines of the Harry Potter series, but with tons of elements taken from Christian beliefs and King Arthur tales. It is a very fast read that will grab you right away and not let you go. I would highly suggest this book to anyone who loves such series as Harry Potter.

Buy/More Info

The Devils Candy The Anatomy of a Hollywood Fiasco

A classic behind-the-scenes account of how a Hollywood blockbuster turned into a bomb that illuminates “how not to make a movie.”– New York Times.

When Brian De Palma agreed to allow Julie Salamon unlimited access to the film production of Tom Wolfe’s best-selling The Bonfire of the Vanities, both director and journalist must have felt like they were on to something big. How could it lose? But instead Salamon got a front-row seat at the Hollywood disaster of the decade. She shadowed the film from its early stages through the last of the eviscerating reviews, and met everyone from the actors to the technicians to the studio executives. They’d all signed on for a blockbuster, but there was a sense of impending doom from the start–heart-of-gold characters replaced Wolfe’s satiric creations; affable Tom Hanks was cast as the patrician heel; Melanie Griffith appeared mid-shoot with new, bigger breasts. This riveting insider’s portrait provides a timeless account of an industry where art, talent, ego, and money combine and clash on a monumental scale.

User Ratings and Reviews

4 Stars No better book to describe how a movie is produced
The Devil’s Candy is the story of the making of The Bonfire of the Vanities. It is the best (and possible only) book in recent times to describe how a movie is made, in depth, from inception to casting to production to editing to screenings and focus groups through release and box office.

The subtitle, “The Anatomy of a Hollywood Fiasco” is misleading. This is not a book that analyses why a movie production went wrong. It is a journalistic look at how a movie is made, any movie, and this book uses the example of the Bonfire of the Vanities because that happened to be the production Julie Salamon was invited to observe from beginning to end. Tellingly, the original version of the book was subtitled instead “Bonfire of the Vanities Goes to Hollywood” and the new subtitle was obviously added for the paperback version to try to pump up sales.

Most of the other reviews have said this book is for industry insiders, but it isn’t. For insiders, there is nothing new here. This book is for people on the outside who want to know how the movie industry works. And what we learn is that for all the glamour, movie production is mostly meetings and sitting around sets doing endless takes of scenes that eventually get cut.

Assuming you’re interested in learning how Hollywood works, from the endless scouting of locations to who is responsible for carrying the director’s thermos of coffee, you will be educated. This book, at more than 400 pages, goes into gory detail, from just about everyone’s point of view, from the director to costume manager. It’s written as you would expect from a journalist on the banking desk at the Wall Street Journal (before she became the movie critic) – straightforward, inclusive, and accurate, not the breathless style with plenty of italics and exclamation points characteristic of showbiz books. But it is also the weakness of the book. There is too much detail that isn’t important, too much describing the color of every carpet in every room visited, what kind of shoes everyone wears, and who is holding De Palma’s coffee thermos at at every moment, too many people’s points of view to keep the narrative flowing.

Overall, if you’re looking for a juicy, fast flowing story about Hollywood disaster, you will be entirely disappointed. However, if you want a textbook on how a movie gets made, want to learn how Hollywood really works, this is *the* book.

4 Stars Students of the Industry Only
This is an exceptional documentary analysis of what goes on in the making of a film. The author, Julie Salamon, was given the opportunity to follow Brian De Palma for the total duration of a very difficult film project, Bonfire of the Vanities, the remake of the famous Tom Wolfe novel. It is an exceptional replay of everything that happened from original purchase of the rights to the novel, to the publicity and reviews of the famous movie, to the ultimate collapse at the box office. One only wonders how this book would have read had the movie been a success.

While I really enjoyed this book, I would not recommend this book to anyone that does not have an intense interest in Hollywood and the making of movies. Excessive time is spent poring over the roles of line producers, second unit directors and production assistants. The book gives you a great understanding not just of the stars but also what it takes to break into the business and what the career path can be. Particularly as it relates to De Palma’s assistant looking for an assistant producer credit and the second unit director looking to break out and become a director of his own films. In addition, it does touch on the stars, both actors and director, and how their idiosyncrasies shape the movie and its making.

This is not a short book. So if you are looking for an exciting page turner, this is not for you. You will spend many pages following the tale of obtaining rights to shoot at certain locations, tales of screen tests of local judges, and boycotts and publicity by Bronx politicians.

Overall, this controversial book detailing separation of the haves and have-nots of the 80s becomes an even more controversial movie with screw-ups in producing of the movie and casting of the roles. But if you want to know what Hollywood is really like and not what just is on the screen, this is the book. You will learn why making movies is so personality driven. For the movie fans, Tom Hanks comes off as the incredible good guy he appears to be. Melanie Griffith and Bruce Willis are not so lucky. But maybe the most interesting personal portrayal is of De Palma. A creature of the 70’s decade of the auteur, his portrayal is of a troubled genius that struggles with communication skills.

I strongly recommend this book if you have a detailed interest in the business of film. If not, take a pass as it will be too detailed.

5 Stars Great blow-by-blow account of movie making
First rate account of the making of Brian De Palma’s Bonfire of the Vanities. Salamon, at the time a reporter for the Wall Street Journal, received what appears to have been total access to director De Palma, the actors, costume designers, cameramen, and practically everyone else involved in the making of the movie. The level of detail may be too much for someone looking for a quick account of what went wrong in the making of this film, but I found it all fascinating. The only other book I know of that provides a comparably detailed inside look at the making of a movie is Lillian Ross’s Picture, which was an account of the making of John Huston’s Red Badge of Courage in 1951. A fair amount has changed in movie making since this book was written. For instance, Salamon devotes considerable time to following the second unit director as he attempts to set up some difficult shots, one involving the landing of a Concorde jet at sunset. These days, I imagine most movie goers would assume such a shot was actually cgi. I read the Da Capo Press 2002 reprint. (Interesingly, the subtitle of the book changed from “The Bonfire of the Vanities Goes to Hollywood” to “The Anatomy of a Hollywood Fiasco.” Probably an indication that this film had been largely forgotten by 2002.) The reprint edition has an afterword that briefly discusses the reception of the book — Bruce Willis was livid — and the impact of the film on the careers of De Palma and the other people who are the focus of the book. Unfortunately, the photos from the first edition are not reproduced and the quality of the printing is a little off. Whatever reproduction technique was used imparted a bit of waviness to many of the lines of text.

4 Stars Excellent Read for Hollywood Biz buffs
If you are like me and you like books on the business of Hollywood you will love this one. I do not like books by Hollywood “insiders”. They tend to write the books for nothing more than to pump themselves up and trash actors/studios, however books by journalists tend to be more even handed. Hit and Run is probably the best book on Hollywood ever written, The Devil’s Cany is now second. What makes this book great is that it explains what the jobs of certain people are. For instance I didn’t know what a second unit director was till I read this. Not to mention that the story about the adaptation of Bonfire of the Vanities makes for a great tale.

5 Stars Great read if you’re curious about the movie business
Julie Salamon was lucky enough to get in at the beginning of what was anticipated to be a great film, and turned out to be one of the biggest critical and financial failures for Warner Bros. The book Bonfire of the Vanities was so popular and written in such a style that taking on the task of adapting it to film was a true challenge and doomed to fail. And fail it did. Salamon also gives a background of the steps it takes to get a picture made from buying the rights of the book to marketing the finished picture. She details the different roles of the movie set, answering the age-old question, “What does a grip do?”. You gather a great understanding of how difficult it is to make a picture by studio standards and how the hierarchy on the set works. Fascinating insight from an outsider let into the circus of making a major motion picture. Brian De Palma must curse the day he agreed to let her chronicle the journey.
Also, I have to recommend reading Tom Wolfe’s Bonfire of the Vanities. You can understand why he wanted no part of making the film adaptaton of his infamous book.

Buy/More Info